トップ «前の日記(2012-06-04) 最新 次の日記(2012-06-06)» 編集

MarriageTheoremのこと

2011|10|11|12|
2012|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2013|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2014|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2015|01|02|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12|
2016|01|02|03|04|05|10|
2017|01|02|04|
2018|02|10|
2020|04|09|
2021|04|

2012-06-05

_ 気になった論文:"Two grumpy giants and a baby"(Daniel J. Bernstein and Tanja Lange, IACR ePrint 2012/294

Pollard's rho algorithm, along with parallelized, vectorized, and negating variants, is the standard method to compute discrete logarithms in generic prime-order groups. This paper presents two reasons that Pollard's rho algorithm is farther from optimality than generally believed. First, ``higher-degree local anti-collisions'' make the rho walk less random than the predictions made by the conventional Brent--Pollard heuristic. Second, even a truly random walk is suboptimal, because it suffers from ``global anti-collisions'' that can at least partially be avoided. For example, after (1.5+o(1))\sqrt(l) additions in a group of order l (without fast negation), the baby-step-giant-step method has probability 0.5625+o(1) of finding a uniform random discrete logarithm; a truly random walk would have probability 0.6753\ldots+o(1); and this paper's new two-grumpy-giants-and-a-baby method has probability 0.71875+o(1).

当初はタイトルだけ見ていてBaby-Step-Giant-Step法の話だったとは気付いていなかったのだが、Twitterでこのプレプリントの話題が流れてきたので気付くことができた。


トップ «前の日記(2012-06-04) 最新 次の日記(2012-06-06)» 編集

最近のツッコミ↓

↑最近のツッコミ
合計: 今日: 昨日:

README 日記の書き方 footnote.rb @Twitter 中の人のページ研究関係
Cryptology ePrint Archive